Paper 2: The National and Global Economy · 9EC0/02

Edexcel A A-level Paper 2, November 2021

All 15 written questions and 5 multiple choice questions from Edexcel A A-level Paper 2 (November 2021), The National and Global Economy. Case studies: Trade and aid in Rwanda. Each question shows its marks and topic, with an examiner insight on 7, and opens the question paper and mark scheme at the right page.

Summer exams were cancelled, so this paper was sat in the autumn series. The paper itself is headed with the original May date.

Section A

Q3(b)Explain4 marks
Explain the likely impact of the change in the exchange rate of the pound shown in the graph from 1st January 2018 to 1st January 2019 on the UK current account of the balance of payments.
Mark splitKnowledge 2Application 1Analysis 1

TopicInternational economicsMeasures of economic performance

Q5(a)1 mark
From the data in the graph above, which one of the following may be deduced?
  1. AFrance’s rate of inflation was lower than Germany’s in 2017
  2. BGermany’s GDP is smaller than France’s in every year shown
  3. CIn every year that France’s GDP fell compared to the previous year,
  4. DThe GDP of both Germany and France fell between 2015 and 2016
Show the answer

The answer is C.

TopicMeasures of economic performance

Section B

Case study

Trade and aid in Rwanda

Extracts: A: Rwandan tariffs on imports of used clothing · B: Development in Rwanda

In the extracts: Rwanda, Rwandan, African, GDP, European Central, Kigali, Bank, Overseas Development Institute, Development in Rwanda Rwanda, Europe and North America

Q6(a)5 marks
Using the data in Figures 1 and 2, calculate the change in the level of total aid funding to Rwanda between 2011 and 2012.
Mark splitKnowledge 1Application 2Analysis 2

TopicEmerging and developing economies

Examiner insight

What to cover
Add the aid components for each year from both Figures, then subtract the 2011 total from the 2012 total. Show the working clearly and state the change with units and direction.
Watch out
Reading only one Figure, so part of total aid is missed, or giving a bare number with no units or sign.
Q6(b)8 marks
With reference to the information provided, examine two likely benefits for the Rwandan economy of the growth in the country’s population.
Mark splitKnowledge 2Application 2Analysis 2Evaluation 2

TopicInternational economics

Examiner insight

What to cover
Choose two, such as a larger labour force raising Rwandan productive capacity, and a bigger domestic market allowing economies of scale and stronger consumption. Chain each through to output and growth.
Diagram
LRAS or production possibility frontier shifting right to show a larger labour force raising productive capacity.
Evaluation
Depends on whether jobs and capital grow with the population. Rapid growth can cut GDP per head and strain schools, housing and farmland in Rwanda.
Watch out
Confusing a bigger population with higher GDP per capita, so the benefits are overstated.
Q6(c)10 marks
With reference to the information provided, assess the likely impact on the Rwandan economy of the change in aid received between 2017 and 2018.
Mark splitKnowledge 2Application 2Analysis 2Evaluation 4

TopicEmerging and developing economies

Examiner insight

What to cover
State from the data whether aid rose or fell, then trace the effect on government spending, AD, infrastructure and human capital, and on the savings gap and current account.
Diagram
AD/AS diagram showing AD shifting with the change in aid funded spending, and LRAS shifting if aid funds infrastructure.
Evaluation
Weigh the size of the change relative to Rwandan GDP, aid dependency and corruption risk, and the lag before human capital raises output. Judge how significant the change really is.
Watch out
Ignoring the data and writing a general essay on whether aid works.
Q6(d)Discuss12 marks
Discuss the likely impact on Rwandan consumers and clothing manufacturers of the increase in the tariff on imports of second-hand clothes. Use an appropriate diagram to support your answer.
Mark splitKnowledge 2Application 2Analysis 4Evaluation 4

TopicInternational economics

Examiner insight

What to cover
The tariff raises the price of imported second-hand clothes, so imports and quantity demanded fall. Rwandan clothing manufacturers gain output and revenue, consumers lose surplus, and government gains tariff revenue.
Diagram
Tariff diagram: domestic supply and demand, world supply, world price plus tariff; label the fall in imports, the rise in domestic output, government revenue and lost consumer surplus.
Evaluation
Weigh infant industry growth and jobs against higher prices for poor households and possible retaliation or lost trade access. Depends on price elasticity of demand and how fast domestic supply can expand.
Watch out
Drawing the tariff diagram but leaving the areas unlabelled, so the consumer and producer effects earn no analysis marks.
Q6(e)Discuss15 marks
Discuss policies, other than import tariffs, that the Rwandan government could use to develop its manufacturing industries.
Mark splitKnowledge 3Application 3Analysis 3Evaluation 6

TopicInternational economics

Examiner insight

What to cover
Suggest subsidies, energy and transport infrastructure, education and training, export processing zones, attracting foreign direct investment, or a competitive exchange rate. Explain how each cuts unit costs or raises Rwandan capacity.
Diagram
Subsidy diagram or LRAS shifting right, labelling lower unit costs and higher output.
Evaluation
Weigh the cost and opportunity cost of spending from a small tax base, time lags and the risk of government failure. Conclude which policy suits Rwanda best.
Watch out
Slipping into tariffs or quotas, which the question rules out.

Section C

Q7Optional25 marks
The European Central Bank introduced a new round of quantitative easing (QE) in March 2020, purchasing up to €750 billion of assets. The objective of this QE was to reduce the serious risks to the effectiveness of monetary policy resulting from a significant recession. The European Central Bank’s target for inflation remains at ‘below but close to 2%’. (Source adapted from: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2020/html/ecb. pr200318_1~3949d6f266.en.html) Evaluate the effectiveness of quantitative easing during ‘a significant recession’.
Mark splitKnowledge 4Application 4Analysis 8Evaluation 9

TopicMacroeconomic objectives and policyEconomic growthThe financial sector

Examiner insight

What to cover
Explain the mechanism: the central bank buys assets, asset prices rise and yields fall, banks gain liquidity, so lending, investment and wealth driven consumption rise. AD shifts right towards the 2% inflation target.
Diagram
AD/AS diagram with AD shifting right from a negative output gap; label the price level and real output.
Evaluation
Weigh weak transmission when confidence and bank lending are low, the liquidity trap, asset price inflation and rising wealth inequality, and the difficulty of unwinding. Depends on the depth of the recession. Judge.
Watch out
Describing QE as printing money for the government, which confuses it with fiscal policy.
Q8Optional25 marks
It has been estimated that if climate change led to the world’s temperature rising 2.5 °C compared to the temperature in 2010, then global GDP per capita would be 15% lower by 2100. If temperatures rise by 4 °C compared to the temperature in 2010, then by 2100 global GDP per capita would decline by more than 30%. (Source adapted from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0071-9) Evaluate the potential trade-offs between environmental protection and other macroeconomic objectives.
Mark splitKnowledge 4Application 4Analysis 8Evaluation 9

TopicMeasures of economic performanceMacroeconomic objectives and policy

Examiner insight

What to cover
Show the conflicts: green taxes and regulation raise firms costs and shift SRAS left, so inflation rises and growth and employment fall, and international competitiveness weakens. Use the GDP per capita losses in the stimulus.
Diagram
AD/AS diagram with SRAS shifting left from higher environmental costs; label the higher price level and lower real output.
Evaluation
Weigh short run costs against long run gains, since unchecked warming cuts global GDP per head by 15% or more. Green investment may raise LRAS and jobs. Depends on time period. Conclude.
Watch out
Treating the environment as a standalone objective and never showing the trade-off with growth, inflation or employment.

Question text is quoted from the question papers, © Pearson Edexcel, for students’ private study. Open the official papers and mark schemes from the links on each question. Examiner insights are written with AI assistance and moderated by Finn.